US Pres Johnson’s Policy in Vietnam

The united States of America is often described as invincible and unyielding. Yet during the Vietnam War, America was forced to look at its weaknesses, both government altogethery and militarily. electric chair Lyndon B. Johnson, in sending U. S. Marines in March 1965, followed in short thereafter by U. S. Army ground combat units, broke the strategical continuity of American involvement in Vietnam and, in so doing, surface the way for the U. S. forces ultimate defeat. Thus, it is plausible that President Johnsons form _or_ system of government in Vietnam was infernal to fail from the beginning.Although conspiracy Vietnam asked for help, which the linked States had previously promised, the entire scrap was managed in order to meet personal insurance-making agendas and to remain politically correct in the worlds eyes rather than to contribute a quick and decisive end to the conflict. This can be seen in the selective bombing of Hanoi throughout the course of the Vietnam Wa r. Politically, this strategy looked precise good. However, militarily it was ludicrous. War is the one bena in which politicians have no place.War is the militarys sole purpose. linked States involvement in Vietnam quelld to escalate throughout the 1950s and into the primaeval 1960s. On imperious 4, 1964, the Gulf of Tonkin incident occurred in which American Naval Vessels in south-central Vietnamese waters were fired upon by northeastward Vietnam. On direful 5, 1964, President Johnson requested a re ancestor expressing the determination of the United States to continue in its basic policy of assisting the free nations of the area to defend their freedom.On August 7, 1964, in response to the presidential request, sex act authorized President Johnson to take all necessary measures to repel any attack against the forces of the United States and to counter further aggression (A). The selective bombing of North Vietnam began instantly in response to this resolution. In Ma rch of the follo get alongg year U. S. armament began to arrive. Although the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution specifically stated that we had no military, political, or territorial reserve ambitions in southeast Asia, the interests back home were of a different nature.The United States was non expecting a more extensive development in Vietnam, and Johnson blow out of the water the nation by his exclusive decision. A mature cracking superpower will make measured and limited use of its power Since in this generation we have become a great power, I am in favor of learning to behave like a great power (B). Thus a major downfall of Johnsons policy was his blatant misuse of his respective power. According to Johnson in his State of the core Address, We will stay because in Asia-and around the world-are countries whose independence rests, in great measure, on confidence in Americas word and tribute (C).However, the political involvement in Vietnam was about much more than ripe promised aid to a weak country in order to prevent the spread of communism. It was about money. After all, fightfares require equipment, guns, tools and machinery. Most of which was produced in the United States. We intervened with money, advisors, bombers, and weapons at a time when even our own government did not claim that North Vietnam was sending forces south (G). It was about proving Americas commitment to stop communism. Or rather to confine communism in its present boundaries.Most of all it was about politics. The military involvement in Vietnam is directly related to the political management of the military throughout the fight. The military controlled by the politicians. The management of the military by the White House for political gain is the primary reason for both the length and cost, both monetary and human, of the Vietnam War. One of the largest problems was the lack of a clear objective in the war and the support to accomplish it. So-how do we end the war in Vietnam? W e mustiness revise our objective.Instead of negotiation, our objective must be to make the war so costly for the Communists that they will end it We must fight the war from our strength, not theirs (F). The politicians dictated the war in Vietnam. It was a limited war the military was never allowed to fight the war in the manner that they theme that they needed to in order to win it. To conclude on the Vietnam War, the political management of the war made it unwinnable. The military was at the mercy of politicians, especially Johnson, who knew very little about what needed to be done militarily in order to win the war.And it is the failure of that regime to come to the negotiate table that has thus far frustrated every effort to excise the problem of South Vietnam from a military to a political solution (E). Therefore, the U. S. Military should be allowed to conduct any war, conflict, or police operation that it has been committed to without political interference or control be cause of the problems and hidden interests which are always present when dealing with politics. There is an enormous difference among political judgment and military judgment. This difference is the primary reason for the end point of the Vietnam War.Vietcong knew they could beat us by wearing the United States down until they surrendered (H). It was the policy of military escalation in Vietnam, however, that proved to be Johnsons undoing as president. It deflected solicitude from domestic concerns, resulted in sharp inflation, and prompted rising criticism, especially among young, draft-aged people. mood of Congress changed, a reflection of public attitudes strongly influenced by the news media, in particular television (I). Although society originally supported Johnsons policy, he preoccupied a large amount of support due to his mistakes.Escalation also failed to win the war. The drawn-out struggle made Johnson even more secretive, dogmatic, and highly stark naked to critic ism. His usually sure political instincts were failing. On March 31, 1968, President Johnson was face with increasing antiwar sentiment. He announced a halt in all bombing north of the 20th parallel and offered to negotiate for peace with North Vietnam. Peace talks began in Paris in May, but were promptly deadlocked. After the United States stopped bombing North Vietnam in early November, the North Vietnamese agreed not to escalate the war.In January 1969 South Vietnam and the NLF joined the talks. (History of the United States) Americans judge the Vietnam War to have been a mistake. Unfortunately, few claim to know what the U. S. should have done differently. President Johnson made sundry(a) unfavorable decisions, and his ignorance led to the demise of our military and political policies. Through the subversion and misuse of power, the strategically wrong military setup, and the high cost, the Vietnam War was doomed to fail from the beginning. It is inevitable that Johnson rec eived the blame.